終極自動翻頁 - 加載並拼接下一分頁內容至當前頁尾,智能適配任意網頁
Fewer conditions generally lead to greater efficiency. Thus, No.3 may be the fastest, and fewer conditions are more likely to remain effective after changes to the document structure.
btw, browsers typically parse CSS selectors from right to left.
Does browsers parse xpath from left to right?
Or Jquery?
css selector vs xpath vs jquery, Which is faster?
a[class*="ClapLv1Pagination_Chie-Pagination__Anchor--Next"]
vs.
//*[@id='ans']/div/div/div[2]/a[contains(@class, 'ClapLv1Pagination_Chie-Pagination__Anchor--Next')]
Yes, browsers parse XPath from left to right. But in most modern browsers, CSS selectors can be more efficient than XPath, unless the document is very large and the "ID/#" is close to the target element.
QingJ © 2025
镜像随时可能失效,请加Q群300939539或关注我们的公众号极客氢云获取最新地址
I have a question.
example URL: https://detail.chiebukuro.yahoo.co.jp/qa/question_detail/q10150141230
Which selector is faster on "nextLink"?
#ans > div > div > div:nth-of-type(2) > div > [class*="ClapLv1Pagination_Chie-Pagination__Anchor--Next"]
#ans > div > div > div:nth-of-type(2) > div > a[class*="ClapLv1Pagination_Chie-Pagination__Anchor--Next"]
a[class*="ClapLv1Pagination_Chie-Pagination__Anchor--Next"]
Does this work like jquery?
Sorry but I am a beginner of programming.
Google translate